Post-Breeding Movements, Refugia Associations, and Road Use of Migrating Gopher Frogs (Lithobates capito) in South Alabama
Krista M. Ruppert, Kolby A. J. Altabet, and Scott A. Rush
Ichthyology & Herpetology 114: xx–xx
Supplemental Table 1. This table summarizes capture information and outcomes for Gopher Frogs in this study. Columns denote summary information, and rows denote individual frogs.
Supplemental Table 2. This table summarizes refugia use by Gopher Frogs tracked in this study. Columns indicate burrow information, while rows indicate frog identification numbers. Frogs that used multiple burrows over the course of the study are represented by multiple rows in chronological order of use.
Supplemental Table 3. This table details the movement statistics calculated for Gopher Frogs in this study, Each column is a movement measurement, and each row is a frog. Steps lengths are listed chronologically within each cell for frogs that took multiple steps. The data from this table is summarized in the “Alabama” row of Table 1.
Supplemental Table 4. This table details characteristics of all refugia observed surrounding the pond during systematic refugia searches. Each row is a 10 m by 10 m plot, and each column describes plot characteristics, refugia observed, and refugia characteristics.